Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM ALI versus STATE


Criminal Code (CRPC) Property Against Section 497 Crimes (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 14 Procedure Code (XI V Of 1860), Section 379 Guaranteed, two days allegedly sitting in a stolen car. Applicants' bail after applicant's grant was stolen and arrested from there, under conditions

1985 P Cr. L J 2704

[Karachi]

Before Nasir Aslam Zahid, J

GHULAM ALI and another‑‑Applicants

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Bail Application No. 614 of 1985, decided on 17th June, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑--

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S. 14‑‑Penal Code (XI.V of 1860), S. 379‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Applicants allegedly found sitting in stolen car two days after its theft and arrested from there‑‑Applicants allowed bail, in circumstances.

Shahdat Awan fur Applicants.

A.G. Manghi, Asstt. A.‑G. for the State.

ORDER

An F.I.R. was lodged on 19‑5‑1985 by the complainant that his car had been stolen. On 22‑5‑1985, according to the prosecution case, both the applicants were found sitting inside the stolen car. They were arrested and challaned. The bail application has been rejected by the learned Sessions Judge, Karachi, on the ground that the applicants were caught red‑handed.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the observation of the learned Sessions Judge that the‑applicants were caught red‑handed is incorrect, as even according to the prosecution case the applicants were found sitting in the car two days after the theft of the car and they were arrested from there. The bail is not opposed by the learned Asstt. A.‑G. According to him, the maximum punishment under section 379, P.P.C. and under section 14 of the Hudood Ordinance for this offence would be three years.

In these circumstances, in my view, the applicants are entitled to bail. Criminal Bail Application No. 614 of 1985 is granted and the two applicants namely Ghulam Ali son of Dust Muhammad and Muhammad Salik son of Muhammad Khan alias Dhaman Khan are ordered to be released on bail on each of the furnishing one surety in the sum of Rs.25,000 each with P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction oft the trial Court.

S.G.D. Bail allowed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Sargodha lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.