Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL KARIM versus MANZOOR AHMAD


Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15A & 21 (1) Requires the tenants to re-send the tenant's request for personal eviction records, or to ask the eight persons mentioned in the petition that the rent by the landlord. After removing the stakeholders on a personal basis. The dispute allowed residents in the building to retain the landlord rather than keep it. The High Court had refused to make such an application for comprehensive relief with the observation that the tenants could file separate affidavits which are vacant from the tenants and include the names of the new tenants.

1985 M L D 1621

[ Karachi]

Before Ajmal Mian, J

ABDUL KARIM--Appellant

versus,

MANZOOR AHMAD and anothers--Respondents

First Rent Appeal No.242 of 1982 and Civil Miscellaneous No.303 of 1985, decided on 17th March, 1985.

Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)--

--Ss. 15-A & 21(1)--Ejectment on ground of personal requirement- Reletting--Application against reletting--Application of tenants for summoning record or to summon eight persons mentioned in application on ground that after ejectment of tenants by landlord on ground of personal requirement from tenements in building in dispute same were let out by landlord instead of retaining them with him--High Court declined to grant such application for composite relief with observation that tenants might file affidavit separately containing details of tenants vacated and names of new tenants.

Nemo for Appellant.

Gharib Nawaz Daccawala for Respondents.

ORDER

This is an application for summoning the record or to summon 8 persons mentioned in the application on the ground that after the disposal of the rent case, several tenements were vacated by the tenants in the building in dispute but the same were let out by the appellant instead of retaining them with him though the rent application in question against the respondents was filed and allowed on the ground of personal requirement.

I am not inclined to grant such an application for composite relief. The respondents may file affidavit separately containing the details of the tenements vacated after the disposal of the present Rent Case and the names of the new tenants. A copy of the above affidavit, may be furnished to the other side, who may file a reply. The above, application is disposed of in the above terms.

H.B.T.

Order accordingly

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Barbar Loi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.