Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL GHAFOOR versus STATE


Article 185 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), the application for the suspension of section 426, the High Court, rejecting such plea, observed that we have applied. But if the appeal is not resolved then the accused should be allowed to move the second (plea) after the summer holidays, the High Court has given reasons for dismissing the accused's request and the accused again. Provided another opportunity to move the High Court if the appeal was not settled. Application for dismissal of appeal within the time of hearing was dismissed

1984 S C M R 439

Present : Aslam Riaz Hussain and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ

ABDUL GHAFOOR‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Petition No. 206 of 1983, decided on 2nd November, 1983.

(Against the order of the Lahore High Court, dated 30‑4‑1983, passed in Criminal Appeal No. 75 of 1981).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973) ---

----Art. 185(3)‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/34 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 426‑Application for suspension of sentence by accused ‑ High Court dismissing such application and observing that we don't allow application, but permit accused to move another (application) after summer vacation in case appeal is not fixed till then Held, High Court gave cogent reasons for dismissing accused's application and provided accused another opportunity for moving High Court again in case appeal was not fixed for hearing within time specified‑Petition for leave to appeal dismissed.

Taj Muhammad Khan Langah, Advocate Supreme Court with Rana Maqbool Ahmad Kadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 2nd November, 1983.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑

Abdul Ghafoor petitioner was convicted under section 302/34, P. P. C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 3,000. He filed an appeal before the High Court against his conviction which was admitted to a regular hearing. Alongwith it he also applied for suspension of his sentence, under section 426, Cr. P. C. which was dismissed vide the impugned order, dated 30‑4‑1983.

2. Hence the present petition.

3. We notice that while dismissing petitioner's application for suspension of sentence the learned Bench of the High Court has observed that:‑

we do not allow the application, but permit the petitioner to move another (application) after summer vacation in case the appeal is not fixed till then."

4. We feel that the High Court has given cogent reasons for dismissing petitioner's bail application. It has also provided him with another opportuni ty for moving the High Court again in case his appeal is not fixed for hearing (before the High Court) within the time specified by it. We feel that the petitioner should avail of opportunity given to him by the learned Division Bench of the High Court.

With this observation the present petition is dismissed.

M.Z. M. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Adda Shaiwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.