Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ALI versus GOVERNMENT OF NW F P


Section 17 Leasehold Rights Auction No legal restriction on such auction has been completely excluded from the jurisdiction of the civil courts.

1984S C M R 31

Present : Muhammad Haleem, Actg. C. J. and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ

MUHAMMAD ALI AND OTHERS‑Petitioners

Versus

GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W. F. P. THROUGH COMMISSIONER. PESHAWAR AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Petition No. 96‑P of 1983, decided on 23rd October, 1983.

(On appeal from the judgment and order dated 16th March; 1983 of the Peshawar High Court, passed in Civil Revision No. 23 of 1982).

West Pakistan Wakf Properties Ordinance (XXVIII of 1961)

‑‑ S. 17‑Auction of leasehold right No legal bar on such auction Jurisdiction of civil Courts completely ousted.

Maulvi Sirajul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by M. Qasim Imam, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioners.

Nemo for respondents.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD HALEEM, ACTG. C. J

.‑‑In this petition the learned counsel for the petitioner challenged the order dated 16th September, 1971, by which the Administrator of Auqaf, N.‑W. F. P., directed that the disputed plots be put to, auction of which the petitioners were the tenants. We asked the learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether there is any legal bar against the auction of lease‑hold right, but he was unable to point out any. There is also another hurdle in the way of the petitioners and that is the bar of jurisdiction of civil Court to go into this question by reason of section 17 of the Waqf Ordinance, 1961, and the subsequent enactments repealing and re‑enacting it in which the same provision exists. The High Court, accordingly, has held that the jurisdiction of the Civil Court was completely ousted and we agree with it.

There is, therefore, no merit in this petition which is hereby dismissed.

M .Z .M Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Nilore lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.