Find a Lawyer

RIAZ MUHAMMAD versus KHADIM MUHAMMAD

Section 8 and 55 of the parents' claim of possession, permanent injunction and care against the sons were the parents of the defendants who were disobedient and made their lives miserable. The defendants claimed that they had made an unregistered transfer in the house. The question suit was decided as well. In the legal matter, the plaintiff was the original owner of the house. The defendants in question could not prove the alleged act in accordance with the law. The plaintiff suffered from being a parent. Care for the Defendants and They Cannot Earn Their Lives Adult children were obliged to care for their parents The trial court correctly ruled that the case was upheld by the appellate court. The following court's finding of concurrence of the facts was well argued and well grounded, could lead to unreadable or unlawful exercise of jurisdiction The plaintiffs' modification was rejected

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• RAHMAT ULLAH v. State 2014 PCrLJ 11
• SHAKEEL AHMED v. State 2014 YLR 12
• PAINDA KHAN v. State 2014 MLD 14
• ABDUL SATTAR v. Mst. SHAGUFTA BANO 2014 CLC 15
• MIR QADIR KHAN v. AYUB KHAN 2014 PLD 25
• MIR SAHIB KHAN v. GHAZI MUHAMMAD 2014 PLD 29
• MUHAMMAD IBRAR v. State 2014 YLR 31
• MUHAMMAD NAZIR v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2014 PLD 35

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

lawer from fb area from Patika lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes