Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 265‑P of 1983, decided on 20th February, 1984.
(On appeal from the judgment of Peshawar High Court, dated 6th November, 1983, in Civil Revision No. 45 of 1982).
--Art. 185(3)‑Petition raising arguments regarding factual aspects No point of law worth examination involved‑Findings in favour of respondent not suffering from any infirmity‑Leave to appeal refused.
Abdul Samad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
Nemo for Respondents.
Date of hearing : 20th February, 1984.
‑Leave to appeal has been sought from judgment, dated 6‑11‑1963 for the Peshawar High Court ; whereby the petitioners' Civil Revision (against the order of a civil Court setting aside an ex parte decree earlier passed in petitioners' favour) was dis missed.
After affording due opportunity to the petitioners the learned trial Judge found as a fact, that the defendants‑judgment‑debtors were not in the fault and that sufficient cause had been shown for setting aside the ex parte decree.
Learned counsel for the petitioners raised arguments regarding factual aspects. No point of law worth examination by this Court is involved. The findings in favour of the respondents do not suffer from any infirmity. This petition is dismissed,
Petition dismissed
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer