Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

DIN MUHAMMAD versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB


Article 185 reads with the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), A XXII, r 3, the Activation Act (IX of 1908), bringing the legal representative of the appellant under the death record of the appellant after the reduction of section 5 appeal. Not requested for and the appeal to expire on the ninth day expires a prolonged delay of delays to keep the reduction presented forty months after the death of the appellant and to bring the legal representative on record. No Reason for Demanding Reason [Appeal Appeal (Civil)]

1984 S C M R 863

Present : Nasim Hasan Shah, M. S. H. Quraishi and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ

DIN MUHAMMAD‑Appellant

Versus

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Appeal No. 161 of 1972, decided on 2nd May, 1983.

(On appeal from the judgment dated 15th February, 1972, of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in L. P. A. No. 4‑C of 1972).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

‑ Art. 185‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXII, r. 3 read with Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 5 ‑Abatement of appeal‑Death of appellant during pendency of appeal‑No application for bringing on record appellant's legal representative made and appeal abating on expiry of ninety days‑Applications for setting aside abatement and for bringing legal representative on record submitted about forty‑four months after appellant's death‑No sufficient cause given for condon ing long period of delay‑Appeal disposed of as having abated. [Abatement‑Appeal (civil)].

Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellant.

Mian Nusratullah, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Sh. Ijaz Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 2nd May, 1983.

JUDGMENT

NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑

During the pendency of this appeal Din. Muhammad, who filed the appeal, died on 12‑12‑1978. It is admitted Mr. Masud Akhtar, learned Advocate‑on‑Record for the deceased‑appellan t that the appeal abated on the expiry of 90 days of the death, namely, on 12‑3‑1979, as no application for bringing on record his legal representa tives was made within the prescribed period of 90 days.

Accordingly, an application for setting aside the abatement and bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased‑appellant along with an application for condoning the delay in filing the said application has been submitted.

We observe that all the above applications have been submitted on 23‑11‑1982, i.e. nearly forty‑four months after the deceased‑appellant's death.

The perusal of the application for condo nation of delay does not, how ever, give any sufficient cause for condoning this long period of nearly 44 months delay. Hence the delay cannot be condoned.

This appeal, therefore, stands disposed of as having abated.

S. Q. Appeal abated.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
female advocates from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.