Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS versus HABIB BANK WORKERS UNION


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 10 (i) (iii) read with Punjab Industrial Relations Rules 1973, r 4 The union was summoned for non-submission of forms \ D \ and \ F submit to the requirements of the Regulations. Defects identified by registrar removed due to inappropriate complaint

1984 P L C 1536

[2nd Labour Court Punjab]

Present: Bashir Ahmad, Presiding Officer

REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS

versus

HABIB BANK WORKERS UNION

Complaint No. 389 of 1982, decided on 13th February, 1983.

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)----

-- S. 10(i) (iii) read with Punjab Industrial Relations. Rules, 1973, r. 4-Deregistration of Union sought on ground of failure to sub mit Forms 'D' and 'F' in accordance with requirements of rules Defects pointed out by Registrar removed-Complaint dismissed as having become infructuous.

H. R. Haider for Respondent.

ORDER

The Registrar of Trade Unions, Lahore Region has made an applica tion under section 10(1) (i) (ii) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 for cancellation of the registration of the Union because the Union had not submitted Forms 'D' and 'F'. Notice was given to the respondent and Zafar Iqbal, General Secretary of the Union appeared and stated that the required forms had been submitted. At which, the representation of the Register stated he would check and report. On the next date Mr. H. R. Haider, Advocate appeared on behalf of the Staff Union of Habib Bank and applied for being impleaded as a party. Reply of that application was filed.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The applicant asserts that on the application of the applicants, complaint was filed against the respondent so applicant is a necessary party. He also relied on ruling of the learned Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal given in petition No. LHR/274-81/Pb., decided on 29th September, 1981.

I have considered this contention. The Registrar of Trade Unions has moved for deregistration of the Union only on the ground that Forms 'D' and 'F' regarding the subscription have not been filed. The com plaint is not on any other allegation in which the applicant can render help because the cancellation has not been asked to be ordered on any other ground than this. So, in my view in the instant case, the applicant is not necessary party.

3. Now, I deal with the merits of the complaint of the Registrar of Trade Unions. The defects pointed out by the Registrar have been removed. Statement of the representative of the Registrar has been recorded. Forms 'D' and 'F' have been submitted so now the complain is infructuous and is dismissed.

M. E.

Complaint dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Haveli Kahuta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.