Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL KARIM versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 497 and 498 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 325, 148 and 149 are jailed for two years on bail and with the offense charged with Section 497, C RPC does not fall under Bell's prohibited clause. Atta

1984 P Cr. L J 3246

[Lahore]

Before Khizar Hayat, J

ABDUL KARIM-Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 845-B of 1983, decided on 18th July, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

--Ss. 497 & 498-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 325, 148 & 149 Bail-Accused in jail for last two months and offence with which accused charged not falling within prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr. P. C.-Bail granted.

Tariq Sher for Petitioner.

Tassadaq Hussain Jilani, A.A.-G. for the State.

ORDER

Abdul Karim petitioner with seven others is accused of offence under section 148, P. P. C., section 325 read with section 149, P. P. C. for having caused simple injuries to Ghulam Muhammad and a grievous hurt :o Sher Muhammad P. Ws. on 13th April, 1983.

2. The petitioner was arrested on 17th May, 1983. His seven co accused have already been released on pre-arrest bail by the Sessions Judge, Muzaffargarh. The petitioner was declined the relief of bail for he was attributed the grievous hurt found on the person of Sher Muhammad involving the fracture of his left forearm. Noor Muhammad A.S.I. states that the challan is still under scrutiny by the prosecuting agency and, therefore, the trial of the petitioner has not so far commenced.

3. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for both the parties, I find that the petitioner is in jail without trial for the last two months and the offence with which he is charged does not fall within prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr. P. C. In these circum stances, I am inclined to allow this petition. The petitioner is directed t be released on bail subject to his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 5,00 (Rupees five thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty Magistrate, Muzaffargarh.

M. Y. H. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Jatoi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.