DR. MUHAMMAD JAVAID SHAFI versus SYED RASHID ARSHAD
First Schedule Arts 91 and 142 of the Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Articles 8 and 39 of the Common Pleas Lawyer's cancellation, sale agreement and sale agreement and the recovery of immovable property The question about joining and seeking various remedies / relief in the suit is the primary treatment / relief sub, incidental and consequent treatment / relief that was allegedly implemented and to file a lawsuit. What measures were to be considered in order to ascertain the duration of the limitation and the Atal General Power of Attorney registered in favor of it? It was On the basis of such power of attorney, the suit plot as defendant / plaintiff's plaintiff was sold to a third person, who in turn sold it to the appellant, after which the general power of attorney was executed. Sixteen years after the registration / registration date, the defendant filed a lawsuit dismissing the documents and seizing the suit, alleging that the power of attorney, the sale agreement and the trial were fraudulent. Obtained by fraud, misrepresentation and manipulation, the trial court dismissed the case on the ground that it was barred. The high court had imposed the ban was, however, rejected the trial judge that the lawsuit filed within twelve years to occupy the immovable property. Thus, the issue of legal status filed by the plaintiff was dealt with by the High Court and resorted to Article 142 of the First Schedule of the Act 1908, where it was alleged that it had been obtained by it. fraud ,
