Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHAMSHAD ALI versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497/498 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 16 8 10 (3) Guarantee The first information report is recorded after the recovery of the kidnappers. Along with the kidnapping, there is no charge of adultery. The matter needs further inquiry into which Beth is given

1984 P Cr. L J 2392

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

SHAMSHAD ALI and another--Petitioners

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 727-B of 1983/BWP, decided on 31st August 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497/498--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss.16 8 10(3)--Bail--First information report recorded after recovery of abductee wherein allegation of abduction as well as Zina not made out--Matter requiring further enquiry--Bait granted.

Malik M.H. Zafar Mison for Petitioners.

Hafiz Muhammad Saeed for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Shamshad Ali and Hashim, petitioners, in a case under sections 16, 10(3) of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, registered at Police Station Ahmadpur East vide F.I.R. No.154/83 dated, 17th June, 1983.

2. The prosecution case is that the petitioners abducted Mst. Parveen in order to subject her to sexual intercourse and thereafter she was subjected to Zina-bil-Jabr.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the F.I.R. which was lodged after the recovery of Mst. Parveen from the Chobara does I of contain the allegations of abduction as well as Zina-bil-Jabr and that the allegations levelled in the F.I.R. if accepted at its face value, no offence punishable under any section of the offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, is made out. Furthermore the witnesses mentioned in the F.I.R. have falsified the story given in the F.I.R. in the affidavits duly sworn by them.

As against this the learned counsel for the State has opposed this application.

4. After hearing the learned counsel and going through the record I find that in the F.I.R. which was admittedly recorded after the recovery of Mst. Parveen by the police, the allegations of abduction as well as Zina, have not been levelled. Without making any expression lest it may prejudice the merits of the case I am of the opinion that the matter requires further inquiry. The petitioners are therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner/ Illaqa Magistrate, Ahamdpur East.

M. Y. H. Bail Granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Kasur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.