Sections 302 (b), 324, 337 D&404 Qatal Im, Qatil Amad, three witnesses interested in the appreciation of evidence, three witnesses interested in the testimony of the witnesses, although there were mutual relations between the two, Dishonest abuse of property Nothing was brought on the record that they had in their mind any ill will or mischief and mischief to make false witnesses and to make false statements. The interested witness was a person whose purpose was to deceive another person into a witness relationship with the deceased. There was no basis for dismissing the evidence of such testimony, the testimony of the prosecution's witness was found to be permanent on the particulars of the material, and no contradiction was found in the same contradiction which gave detailed account of the incident. A two-hour delay in confirming the contents of the IR was confirmed. Filing the report was not fatal to the prosecution case as one of the prosecution witnesses, who was critically injured, was taken to the hospital, where the complainant reported the matter to the police. The injured prosecutor is the brother of the witness, and there has been no compelling reason for the defense to indicate why the witness would replace the culprits with the real culprits. The incident happened inside the house where the witnesses of the victim and the prosecution were living together. And the incident happened overnight, the presence of the prosecution witnesses was natural and their presence on the spot could not be suspected, and the parties knew each other, and especially in light of the 24-volt energy saver bulb's identification of the accused, Can't ask
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
