Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10/11 Bail, Applicant's Grant. Under Section 10/11, there are allegations of the Enforcement Code of Adultery (VII VI of 1979), but the alleged abductees did not attract the applicants and did not admit to marrying the applicants. Allowed bail, under the circumstances

1984 P Cr. L J 928

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ AND OTHERS-Petitioners

versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 992 /B of 1982, decided on 7th August, 1982.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

-- S. 497-Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 10/11-Bail, grant of-Petitioners; accused of offences under S. 10/11, Offence of Zina. (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979). but alleged abductees not implicating peti tioners and admitting their Nikah with petitioners on. their own accord-Petitioners allowed bail, in circumstances.

Sardar Muhammad Latif Khan Khosa and M. Arif for Petitioners.

Tasadduq Hussain Jilani, A. A.-G. for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Muhammad Nawaz, Master Mukhtar Hussain, Riaz Hussain, Jamal Khan and Khadim Hussain in a case under section 10/11 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 registered at P. S. Mailsi, vide F.I.R. No. 110/128, dated 12th May, 1982.

2. The prosecution case is that the petitioners abducted Mst. Zaib Mahi and Mst. Nazir Mahi with intent that the ladies may be subjected to sexual intercourse by someone.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it is not a case of abduction and in fact Mst. Nazir Mahi and Mst. Zai1.-Mai had contracted marriage with Mukhtar Hussain and Riaz Hussain, respectively (their cousins) on their own accord.

Learned counsel for the State has however, opposed this application. The A. S. I. informs that the alleged abductees have contracted marriage with Mukhtar and Riaz and in their statements recorded under section 164, Cr. P. C. they have belied the story of the abduction.

4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I find that th alleged abductee have not implicated the petitioners and have stated that their nikah with Mukhtar and Riaz were on their own accord.

In these circumstances, the petitioners are allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Mailsi.

M.Y.H. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Sudhnoti lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.