Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUKHIAR ALIAS MUKHA versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Determination Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/148/4401149 The alleged firearm suspect is neither attributed to the firearm nor to any witnesses. There was a similar injury.

1984 P Cr. L J 375

[Lahore]

Before Mazhar ul Haq, J

MUKHTAR alias MUKHA AND 2 OTHERS -Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2371-B of 1983, decided on 11th October, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

-- S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/148/4401149 ---Accused allegedly armed with fire-arms-Neither any fire-arm injury attributed to deceased nor such injury found to any of witnesses---Bail granted.

Zafar Pasha for Petitioners.

Noor Muhammad Paras for the State.

Date of hearing : 11th October, 1983.

ORDER

Mukhtar alias Mukha, Sarfraz alias Pappoo and Saleem petitioners alongwith Hayat and Akbar are accused of the murder of Ilam Din and Rafiq. The case was registered against them on 28th March, 1983 at Police Station, Mangtanwala, District Sheikhupura.

2. A dispute over the possession of land led to the occurrence in this case. At noon on 28th March, 1983 the petitioners, their co-accused Hayat and Akbar, all armed with .12 bore guns let loose about 50 cattle heads for causing damage to the fodder crop grown in the said field. Nazir informant checked them, upon which Sarfraz alias Pappoo petitioner caught hold of him and Saleem petitioner inflicted injuries to him on the left shoulder and his arm with the Butt end of his gun. The alarm attracted his father Ilam Din, his brothers Rafiq, Arif and their uncle Ashiq. As they reached near, Hayat opened fire and hit Ilam Din on his thigh, who died at the spot. Akbar fired the second shot hitting Rafiq in the left flank who died later. The third shot was fired by Mukhtar petitioner, which hit Nazir informant in the face. Saleem peti tioner beat up Arif with the Butt end of his gun hitting him in the flank. In the F. I. R. the fatal shots to the deceased are attributed to Hayat and Akbar accused. According to the Medical Report of Nazir, there is no firearm injury to him. The alleged Butt end injury of Arif has no visible mark but is described as pain complained by the victim. Keeping in view the fact that the petitioners are not attributed any fire-arm injury to the two deceased, and that there is also no fire-arm injury to any of the witnesses, I, therefore, allow bail to the three petitioners in the sum of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfac tion of A. C./Duty Magistrate. Nankana Sahib, District Sheikhupura.

3. Copy dasti on payment of usual charges.

M. B. A. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Mailsi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.