Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ALLAH DITTA versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 364 A girl accused of kidnapping a man is contracted a marriage contract with a male accused against the wishes of his family. The only guaranteed bail of the approved male accused was the certified female suspect himself missing. His bail plea was dismissed as invalid

1984 M L D 1585

[Lahore]

Before Khizar Hayat, J

ALLAH DITTA and 2 others--Petitioners

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1980-B of 1982, decided on 22nd December, 1982,

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.364--Bail--Abduction Accused girl contracting marriage with male accused against wishes of her family--Accused girl a sui juris--Male co-accused already granted bail- Bail granted to male accused confirmed--Female accused absenting herself; her bail petition dismissed being infructuous.

Petitioners in person.

Nasim Rashid for the State.

ORDER

This order may be read in continuation of my' earlier order, dated 14-12-1983 whereby I granted interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioners with notice to the State. Today, the matter has come up for confirmation of bail.

2. At the outset, S.I. Fida Hussain has stated that yesterday when the petitioners (including Mst. Ghulam Fatima, abductee were coming to join the investigation at Police Station Dunyapur, ten persons of the complainant party waylaid them at the Bus-stand of Dunyapur Town and took away Mst. Ghulam Fatima forcibly. He has stated that case under section 364, P.P.C. has been registered against the abductors and he has succeeded in arresting two accused persons in that case and has also recovered the wagon used in the commission of the offence. The circumstances show that Mst. Ghulam Fatima, petitioner, had contracted marriage with Allah Jawaya, petitioner, against the wishes of her family and that is why they have resorted to violence to take over her custody. Mst. Ghulam Fatima is admittedly a 'sui juris' and Allah Ditta, petitioner, is brother of Allah Jawaya, petitioner. Allah Bakhsh and Mst. Hatan, co-accused of the petitioners, have already been, bailed out by the Sessions Court.

3. In these circumstances, I am inclined to allow this petition qua Allah Ditta and Allah Jawaya; petitioners and the bail granted to them earlier is hereby confirmed. To the extent of Mst. Ghulam Fatima, petitioner, this petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous due to her absence.

M.Y.H. Interim anticipatory, bail confirmed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Lahore lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.