Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AMIN versus STATE


In accordance with Criminal Code (CR PC) Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 307 Ball, injury grants attributable to one of the applicants were simplified, while the physical part did not guarantee significant applicants. The other applicant was hurt due to the reason.

1984 M L D 1546

[Lahore]

Before Mazharul Haq, J

MUHAMMAD AMIN and another--Petitioners

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 914/B of 1984, decided on 23rd April, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.307--Ball, grant of--Injury attributed to one of petitioners declared simple whereas injury caused by other petitioner not on vital part of body--Petitioners allowed bail, in circumstances.

Muhammad Amin Zafar for Petitioners.

Mian Mushtaq Ahmad for the State.

Lal Khan Baloch for the Complainant.

Date of hearing: 23rd April, 1984.

ORDER

Ijaz Mahmud alias Bagoo and Muhammad Amin petitioners alongwith Muhammad Zafar Javed and Mukhtar are accused of having murderously assaulted Muhammad Arshad and Faqir Muhammad. The case was registered against them on 1-2-1984 at Police Station Jaranwala.

2. Muhammad Amin was said to have inflicted a sharp-edged weapW" injury to Arshad on the right side of his chest which was later declared simple. Ijaz Mahmud petitioner was ascribed an injury on the wrist of Faqir Muhammad which was declared grievous.

3. All the accused were allowed bail by the trial Court. Later the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faisalabad cancelled the bail of Muhammad Amin and Ijaz Mahmud petitioner on the ground that they caused injuries with sharp-edged weapons and that the cross version was found baseless by the police.

4. I have considered the matter. Since the injury attributed to Muhammad Amin was later declared simple and the one caused by Ijaz Mahmud is not on a vital part of the body. I, therefore, allow them bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A . C /Duty Magistrate, Jaranwala, District Faisalabad pending trial.

M. Y. H. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Yazman Mandi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.