Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

REHMAT ALI versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 498 (XLV of 1860), Sections 419, 420, 471 and 109 of the Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) forgery in the bail (accused) )) The Revenue Record Assistant Commissioner confirms the interim guarantee of the accused by maintaining inquiries and entries using the powers of the Chief Settlement Commissioner.

1984 M L D 1540(1)

[Lahore]

Before Ijaz Nisar, J

Rehmat Ali--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.220-B of 1984, decided on 6th March, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 498--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 419, 420, 471 & 109--Prevention of Corruption Act. (II of 1947), S.5(2)--Bail--Bogus entries allegedly made by accused (Patwari) in Revenue record--Assistant Commissioner exercising powers of Chief Settlement Commissioner making enquiry and maintaining entries--Interim bail of accused confirmed.

Aslam Ali Qureshi for Petitioner.

Atta Ullah for the State.

ORDER

The allegation against the petitioner was that he, while posted as Patwari, made certain bogus entries in the revenue record showing the land of Muhammad Siddique complainant as allotted to Badar Islam claimant.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that before the registration of the present case an enquiry had been made into this allegation by the Additional Settlement Commissioner exercising the power of Chief Settlement Commissioner, Dera Ghazi Khan, who vide his order dated 26-7-1978 found that the allotment in favour of Badar Islam was correct and accordingly, maintained the same.

3. In view of the above circumstances, it appears to be a fit easel for bail. Accordingly, I confirm the interim bail of the petitioner. He is, however, directed to join the investigation.

M. Y. H. Bail confirmed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.