Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FAZAL MASIH versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 307 Guarantee, shows a person injured in his abdomen with a very small size knife as well as a fist gun Has happened. Applicant intends to cause death of injured person, will need further investigation; in such cases the applicant has granted bail

1984 M L D 1480

[Lahore]

Before Khizar Hayat, J

FAZAL MASIH--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1375/B of 1983, decided on 15th November, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 307--Bail, grant of Pellets of very small size hitting injured person in his abdomen as well as on nostril--Gun appearing to have been discharged from distant range- Question whether petitioner intended to cause death of injured person, held, would require further inquiry, in circumstances--Petitioner allowed bail.

Athar Rehman Khan for Petitioner.

Shahid Latif for the State.

ORDER

Fazal Masih is accused of having fired a gun-shot at Muhammad Rafique P.W. as a result of which he received two pellet injuries one in the abdomen and the other on right nostril. He was admitted in the hospital on 7-5-1983 and discharged from there on 15-5-1983. Ultimately the injuries were declared as simple by the doctor vide his report, dated 18-7-1983.

2. Having remained unsuccessful before the Addl. Sessions Judge, the petitioner has moved this Court for the grant of bail.

3. It has been argued on behalf of the petitioner that no doubt the petitioner allegedly fired at Muhammad Rafique P.W. but the injuries suffered by him are simple in nature and as such the provisions of section 307, P.P.C. are not attracted to the facts of the case.

4. As against this learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the grant of bail saying that the injury though simple in nature was caused with a fire-arm which is seated on the most vital part of the victim i.e. abdomen and as such the petitioner can safely be saddled with the "intention to kill" Muhammad Rafique.

5. I have considered the arguments of both the learned counsel carefully. The dimension of the injury shows that the pellets of very small size have hit Muhammad Rafique P.W. in his abdomen as well as on his nostril. The gun seems to have been discharged from a distant range, that is why small damage appears to have been caused underneath the injuries. In the circumstances, it would need further inquiry as to whether the petitioner really intended to cause his death or not. I am, therefore, inclined to allow this petition. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 (Rupees ten thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A . C . /Duty Magistrate, Burewala:

S. G. D. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Hattian lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.