Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAIK MUHAMMAD versus KHAN MUHAMMAD


Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Bail of Applicants, Grant, asserted, while his co-accused allegedly struck a victim with Sathera, who was a carpenter's execution session judge, Denial of bail given by the session judge denied arbitration, using discretion in favor of the applicant in a fair and judicial manner, in the circumstances

1984 M L D 1405

[Lahore]

Before Khizar Hayat, J

NAIK MUHAMMAD--Petitioner

Versus

KHAN MUHAMMAD and another--Respondents

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1250-B of 1982, decided on 14th November, 1982.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302--Bail, grant, of--Petitioner ascribed Japha while his co-accused inflicted a blow on person of deceased with Sathra admittedly a carpenter's implement--Sessions Judge, held, exercised discretion in favour of petitioner in a proper and judicial manner, calling for no interference--Cancellation of bail granted by Sessions Judge declined, in circumstances.

Muhammad Bashir Khan for Petitioner.

Sahibzada Farooq Ali Khan for Respondents.

Ch. Nazir Ahmad for the State.

ORDER

This petition has been moved by Nalk Muhammad complainant seeking cancellation of bail granted by the Sessions Judge, Multan, vide order, dated 16-9-1982 in murder case registered at Police Station Khanewal. Initially a case was registered against Khan Muhammad respondent and his father Allah Ditta on the allegation that Muhammad Shafi deceased and his brother Naik Muhammad complainant exchanged abuses with Allah Ditta accused as the latter refused to work his tubewell at the former's request. Immediately after the exchange of abuses Allah Ditta allegedly brought Sathra (an iron implement used by carpenters) and caused solitary blow on the neck of Muhammad Shafi while the respondent Khan Muhammad held him in his grip. Learned Sessions Judge, Multan, while granting bail to the respondent observed that only 'Japha' was ascribed to him (respondent) and it can well be argued that when the abuses were exchanged Allah Ditta in the heat of moment inflicted blow with Sathra with which he was working. It may be noted here that Sathra is an implement of work used by the carpenters and the respondent as well as his father are admittedly carpenters by profession save carefully gone through the order of the learned Session Judge and find that he had exercised the discretion in favour of the respondent in a proper and judicial manner which does not call for any interference. The result is that this petition has no force and is, hereby, dismissed.

S. G. D. Bail maintained.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
how to become a advocate from Kamalia lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.