Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) S 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Bail, Applicant's Grant also suffered a serious injury as a result of the firearm and a question as to which party has so far. The attacker was the one who decided the trial court: a bail application allowed

1984 M L D 1318

[Lahore]

Before Kamal Mustafa Bokhari, J

MUHAMMAD AFZAL --Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1295/B of 1983, decided on 24th October, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302--Bail, grant of--Petitioner also suffering one grievous injury by fire-arm and question as to which party was aggressor yet to be determined by trial Court--Held: A case of further inquiry in circumstances--Petitioners allowed bail.

Muhammad Bashir Khan for Petitioner.

Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for the State.

Date of hearing: 24th October, 1983.

ORDER

Petitioner alongwith one other is accused of offence under section 302/34, P.P.C. Petitioner passed through the lane of the complainant party to which objection was taken. Complainant, who was accompanied by the deceased followed the petitioner when 'the petitioner opened fire killing the deceased in the adjacent lane. It was stated in the F.I.R. that Muhammad Ramzan P.W. caused brick-bat injury to Muhammad Afzal petitioner. According to the medical evidence petitioner was examined on the very day on which F.I.R. was registered and the medico-legal report discloses that the petitioner had suffered one grievous injury by fire-arm. In the circumstances the case against petitioner is of further inquiry. It will be for the trial Court to determine as to who was the aggressor. Therefore, I order release of the petitioner on bail subject to his furnishing security in the sum of Rs. 25,000 (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate Multan.

S . G . D . Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Ziarat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.