Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD LATIF versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 307, 34 and 109, PPC bail, an alleged firearm was issued to the complainant's head in the defendant's grant , Which has been reported that the suspect has been identified as the accused. The accusation of being innocent by the police came when he injured 7 people with his two guns and firearms. The accused (the complainant) and the other members of his party (FIR) In the case) and the other parties to the complaint filed in the private complaint are of two versions and require further investigation into which of the two parties is required to guarantee bail. Was approved for

1984 M L D 1292

[Lahore]

Before Lehrasap Khan, J

MUHAMMAD LATIF--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2726-B of 1983, decided on 22nd November, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 307, 34 & 109, P.P.C.-- Bail, grant of--Accused allegedly giving single fire-arm injury on head of complainant--Said injury found to be simple-- Co-accused found to be innocent by police--Accused during occurrence suffering 7 injuries himself both by blunt and fire-arm weapons--Accused also filing private complaint against injured person (complainant) and other members of his party--Complainant (in F.I.R. case) and his other partymen summoned in said private complaint--Case being of two versions and requiring further inquiry as to which of two parties were liable for aggression Bail granted in circumstances.

Malik A.R. Arshad for Petitioner.

Arshad Khan for the State.

Muhammad Iqbal for the Complainant.

Date of hearing: 22nd November, 1983.

ORDER

Muhammad Latif petitioner who is involved in a case under section 307/34/109, P.P.C. arising out of F.I.R. No. 192/83, dated 8-5-1983 of Police Station, Peoples Colony, Faisalabad seeks to be released on bail through the present petition.

2. The allegations against the petitioner and his co-accused are that on 8-5-1983 at 8-30 p.m., the petitioner and his co-accused Muhammad Ashraf and a third unknown associate of theirs made an assault on Munir Ahmad and his son Qasim. The petitioner was allegedly armed with carbine while his co-accused Ashraf was allegedly carrying a pistol. The role attributed to the petitioner is that he fired at Munir Ahmad complainant with his carbine hitting him on his head. His son Qasim was injured with pistol at the hand of Muhammad Ashraf. It is also alleged that this assault was launched by the petitioner and his co-accused at the behest of Haji Muhammad Shafi and his sons who are owners of Ijaz Cloth House.

2-A. As a result of police investigation, Haji Muhammad Shafi and his sons and also Muhammad Ashraf co-accused of the petitioner have been found to be innocent and their names have been placed in column No.2 of the challan. It is noteworthy that during the occurrence, the petitioner also sustained as many as seven injuries. Six injures have been declared to have been caused by blunt weapon while the seventh injury has been declared to have been caused by a fire-arm. All the injuries on his person have, of course, been declared as simple. Similarly, in case of the complainant the only injury on his person attributed to the petitioner has also been declared as simple. The petitioner has also filed a complaint against the complainant and other members of his party alleging that in fact they assaulted the petitioner and others. In that complaint, the complainant and others have been summoned. The case is thus of cross-versions and it is a matter of further enquiry as to which of the two parties is liable for the aggression.

3. In the circumstances, the petitioner is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs. 20,000 (twenty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. Faisalabad.

H. A. K. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Mardan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.