Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Criminal Appeal No. 246 of 1978, decided on 20th May, 198:1.
---- Ss. 409, 467, 468 & 471-Forgery-Evidence appreciation of -- Benefit of doubt-- Evidence of interested prosecution witnesses on material facts not only full of suspicion but also devoid of truth and contradictory - Delivery of disputed pay-orders to accused either through acquitted co-accused a postman, or someone else and genuineness of writing on specimen sheet allegedly in hand of accused, not proved beyond reasonable doubt-Two handwriting experts holding different opinions bout disputed writings -Evidence against acquitted co-accused believed by trial Court Accused given benefit of doubt and acquitted, in circumstances -- [Benefit of doubt].
P L D 1963 S C 51; P L D 1982 SC(A J & K)89 and P L D 1982 Kar. 255 ref.
S. Saghir Hussain Jafri for Appellant,
G. A. Warsi for the State
Date of hearing: 10th May, 1984.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer