Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE versus STATE


Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) Section 14 PC14 The quality of the bond forfeiture proceedings No showcase notice works on a guaranteed bail before a bail is granted and a bail bond notice Subsequently, a remand is obtained on the decision of the pre-arrest question.

1984 P Cr. L J 2892

[Karachi]

Before Z. C. Valiani, J

MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE---Applicant

Versus

THE STATE---Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.6 of 19684, decided on 30th January, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---

-----S.514 read with S.561-A Forfeiture of surety bond---Quality of proceedings No show cause notice serve on surety prior to passing order of forfeiture of bail bond Proceeding quashed and case remanded for deciding question of forfeiture afresh after notice to surety.

S. Aijaz Ali Shah for Applicant.

Zawar Hussain Jafferi, A.A.-G for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for quashment of the order dated 5th June, 1982 passed by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Shikarpur in Sessions Case No. 125/1981 forfeiting the bail bond amount of Rs. 5,000 on the ground that accused Moghul remained absent on the date of hearing without any permission. I had ordered notice to the learned A.A.‑G. in order to ascertain, whether prior to the passing of the forfeiture order any show‑cause notice was served on the present applicant. Mr. Zawar Hussain Jafferi, learned A.A.‑G. states that from the record it seems that no notice was served on the applicant prior to the passing of the above order, dated 5th June, 1982. 1 would, therefore, allow the present applicant and quash the order and remand the case to the learned Assistan'tl Sessions Judge, Shikarpur, to decide the question of forfeiture afresh after notice to the applicant in terms of section 514, Cr.P.C.

S. G. D. Case remanded.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.