Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497/498 Bail Bail The judge acquitted the defendant with the maximum bail, the grant of bail, the confiscation, the imposition of a heavy bail amount, allegedly invalid by the banned students. The amount used has not yet been determined in which case the amount of money has decreased

1984 P Cr. L J 2464

[Karachi]

Before Z. C. Valiani, J

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS and 2 others--Applicant

versus

THE STATE--Respondent.

Criminal Bail Application No.183 of 1983, heard on 15th March, 1983.

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497/498--Bail--Bail granted to accused by Special Judge with exorbitant surety amount--Grant of bail, held, nullified by imposing a heavy surety amount--Two accused in case stated to be petty businessmen, one of them a student--Exact amount allegedly misappropriated also not yet determined--Surety amount reduced in circumstances.

(b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

---S. 497/498--Bail, grant of--Quantum of surety amount--Courts granting bail, held, are expected to take into consideration status as well as financial position of accused persons involved.

Raja Qureshi for the Applicant.

I, Memon, A.A.-G. for the State.

ORDER

The learned A.A.-G. who is present in Court today has been given notice of the above application and consequently he submitted that the surety amount is prima facie exorbitant and as such he has no objection, if the same is reduced reasonably.

Without going into the merits of the case pending against the applicant, but keeping in view the last para of order, dated 13th March, 1983 of the learned Special Judge (Central), Karachi by which applicants have been granted bail, I considered the surety amount per se is exorbitant and-as such grant of bail is practically nullified by imposing such heavy surety amount. In this connection the object for taking sureties has now well been established and the Courts are expected to take into consideration status as well as financial position of the accused persons before it. In the present case two accused are said to be petty businessmen and one of them is alleged to be student. The exact amount alleged to have been misappropriated is also not yet determined. Keeping in view these facts, 1 allow the above application and reduce the surety amount from sum of Rs.5,00,000 to Rs.50,000 in respect of each applicant and direct the trial Court to accept the sureties from the applicants in accordance with this order, in respect of the bail already granted to the applicants by the learned trial Court.

M. Y. H . Petition allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from Faisalabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.