Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD YOUSUF AWAN versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, IRRIGATION


Appeal against the Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974 Section 4 Seniority Severity List Notification was canceled and the new notification issued Appeal forms a petition to continue its appeal against the notification request after becoming a Appellant, under the circumstances, not approved.

1983 P L C (C. S.) 610

[Service Tribunal Punjab]

Before Malik Zawwar Husain and Abdul Hamid Chaudhry, Members

MUHAMMAD YOUSUF AWAN

versus

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, IRRIGATION

DEPARTMENT AND 6 OTHERS

Case No. 358/1828 of 1982, decided on 10th February, 1983.

Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)‑

‑‑‑‑‑S. 4‑Appeal against seniority‑Seniority list notification cancelled and new notification issued‑Appeal becoming infructuous‑Appellant making application for continuing his appeal against new notification‑Application, in circumstances, not granted.

Malik Amjad Hussain for Appellant.

Haroon‑ur‑Rashid Cheema, District Attorney for Respondent No. 1.

Ch. Mushtaq Masood for Respondent No. 3

M. A. Riaz for Respondents Nos. 4 and 6.

JUDGMENT

MALIK ZAWWAR HUSSAIN (MEMBER).

‑In case of Muhammad Yousaf Awan, written statement has been filed on behalf of respondent No. 3 On the last date of hearing an application on behalf of respondent Ns. 4 and 6 was filed stating that the impugned Notification dated 1p‑7‑1982 has been cancelled by a Notification dated 28‑7‑1982 (Annexure R 4/1), thus the appeal has become infructuous and is liable to be dismissed. A notice was issued to the appellant for' today. Malik Amjad Hussain, Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant has submitted an applic ation, in its reply, with the request that the appeal may be treated as an appeal against the Notification dated 28‑7‑1982 and he may be permitted to continue with the appeal.

2. We have heard the arguments of the parties. Since the impugned Notification has been cancelled and a new seniority list has been issued vide Notification dated 28‑7‑1983, so the present appeal has become infructuoua because the order impugned in the appeal is no longer in the A field. There is no force in the request of the appellant to allow him to treat the present appeal as an appeal against the Notification dated 28‑7‑1982.

3. In view of the above, the application filed on behalf of the appellant and his appeal is dismissed. However, if advised, the appellant may file fresh appeal against the new Notification in accordance with law, which would be subject to all just exceptions.

Them will be no orders as to costs.

Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Khanbel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.