Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

YAQUB SHAH versus CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (PUNJAB)


Article 4 ((P)) Applicant Allow Appeal that He Was Accused of Submitting a Form for Allotment of Houses in 1959, but Houses Offered by Public Auction in 1973, 14 Years Later Applicants' civil lawsuits, appeals and reviews were also dismissed, arguing that the constitutional petition was upheld and only because of the civil suit was dismissed. Can't be prosecuted.

1983 S C M R 230

Present.: Muhammad Haleem, Actg. C. J., Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Shafi‑ur‑Rehman, JJ

YAQUB SHAH ‑Petitioner

Versus

CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (PUNJAB)

AND OTHERS‑‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 201‑F of 1982, decided on 23rd November, 1982.

(Against the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi dated 13‑1 I‑1982 in Civil Revision No. 258‑D of 1980).

Constitution

of Pakistan (1973)‑

‑‑ Art. 185(3)‑Leave to appeal‑Petitioner alleging to have filed form for allotment of a house in 1959 but taking action in respect of same after 14 years when house disposed of by public auction is 1973 His appeal and inordinately delayed constitutional petition challenging auction also ,dismissed‑Petitioner's civil suit, appeal and revision also dismissed‑Contention that constitutional petition having been dismissed in limine and only on ground of ]aches civil suit could not be barred‑Petitioners' conduct, held, disentitled him to any relief.

Khawaja Muhammad Farooq, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 23rd November, 1982.

ORDER

SHAFI‑UR‑REHMAN, J.

‑The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the Lahore High Court dated 13‑11‑1982 whereby a civil revision petition filed against the dismissal of the suit and its affirmance in first appeal was dismissed.

The petitioner claimed to have filed in 1959 KNCH form for the transfer of House AA‑1158 Mohallah Akalgarh Rawalpindi. He took action in respect of it after fourteen years when the house was disposed of in public auction on 2 ‑1‑1973. His appeal and inordinately delayed constitutional petition challenging the auction failed. He then filed a civil suit which was dismissed. So was the appeal and revision.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as the constitutional petition was dismissed in limine and only on the ground of laches, a civil suit was not barred.

The conduct of the petitioner disentitled him to any relief. For the same reason we do not consider it a fit case for grant of leave to appeal. The petition is dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Sagri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.