Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL RAB versus ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, A. D. C. (G), MULTAN


Article 185 (3) Homelessness (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), Section 10 Informant application not pressing against the deceased person is not appropriate for sanction of leave from the High Court case Applicant has to appear before the Supreme Court Appealing is not allowed by emphasizing points. Request dismissed

1983 S C M R 1090

Present: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and M. S. H. Quraishi, JJ

ABDUL RAB AND OTHERS‑Petitioners

versus

THE ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, A. D. C. (G),

MULTAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1027 of 1976, decided on 15th March, 1983.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated 30‑8‑1976).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973) ---

--‑Art. 185 (3)‑Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), S. 10‑Mukhbari application against dead person‑Points not pressed before High Court‑Case not fit for grant of leave to appeal by permitting petitioner to urge new points before Supreme Court Petition dismissed.

Taj Muhammad Khan Langah, Advocate Supreme Court and Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 15th March, 1983.

ORDER

M. S. H. QURAISHI, J.‑

The petitioners filed a mukhbari application in a land settlement matter but failed before the relevant authorities because it was filed against dead person, namely, Hasan Ali. They attempted to bring on record the legal representatives of the dead person after the repeal of the relevant law. They sought relief from the High Court in its writ juris diction and the same having been dismissed, they have sought leave to appeal for which learned caunsel has urged two points : (1) that a separate application against the sons of Hassan Ali was filed by the same petitioners before the authorities ; therefore, the Mukhbari proceeding could proceed on this other application, and (ii) that it was not necessary for the peti tioners in their Mukhbari application to implead any person, if it was suffi ciently made clear as to which allotment was under challenge.

None of these points were pressed before the learned Judge he High Court. It is mentioned in the order, dated 224‑1975 impugned be High Court that Hassan Ali had died nearly 15 years earlier. That being so we do not consider it a fit case for grant of leave to appeal by permitting the petitioners to urge new points. This petition accordingly is dismissed.

M. Z. M. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Mian Chunnu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.