Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

RASAB versus STATE


Article 185 (3) is read with panel code (XLV of 1860), sections 302 and 304 (1) / 34 and the appeal for leave to appeal is 351 days in length, however, given the fact. It has been left to appeal the Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), against the fate of the co-accused in the same case already given to examine the entire evidence of section 417.

1983 S C M R 1018

Present : Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ

RASAB AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Criminal Petition No. 340 of 1980, decided on 31st March, 1981.

(On appeal from the judgment and order dated 2nd April, 1979 of the Lahore High Court in Cr. A. 323 of 1977).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑--

---Art. 185(3) read with Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302 & 304(1)/ 34‑Murder‑Petition for Leave to Appeal time‑barred by 351 days Leave to appeal, however, granted in view of fact that leave to appeal against acquittal of co‑accused in same case already granted to appraise entire evidence‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 417.

Ch. M. A. Wahid, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 31st March, 1981.

ORDBR

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, Actg. C. J.

‑This petition is barred by 351 days.' WC have Bone through the application for condonation of delay and hoard the counsel. In view of the order we propose to pass regarding the grant of Leave in this case, we condone the delay in filing the petition.

The facts leading to the present petition are briefly that the two petitioners, were tried alongwith 15 others inter alia, for the murder of Habib, Abdullah and Babawal Haq. The learned trial Judge convicted the petitioner alongwith seven co‑accused. The remaining eight accused, however, were acquitted. The petitioner and six of his co‑accused were sentenced to death. Only Gbulam Rasul was sentenced to imprisonment for life.

The petitioners alongwith their seven convicted accused filed an appeal before the High Court. The seven co‑accused were acquitted altogether, but the appeal of the two petitioners was accepted only to the extent that they were acquitted of the charge under section 302 and their conviction altered to one under section 304 1, P. P. C. and they were sentenced to imprisonment for life on three counts. They have now filed the present petition for leave to appeal against their conviction and sentence.

Gulam Ali, complainant, had earlier filed a petition against the acquittal of the petitioner and their seven co‑accused by the High Court of the charge of murder and leave was granted to him by this Court on the 10th of February, 1980.

Considering that the entire evidence will have to be appraised in connection with the appeal filed against petitioner's acquittal, leave is also granted to the petitioners.

S. Q. Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from Jamrud Road lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.