Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MAQHOOL BEGUM versus GULLAN


O XXVI, r 6 revision request which was not prepared by the Advocate which was submitted and requested and requested to appeal before the Supreme Court Advocate for filing a record for approval of immunity in this regard. That at the time of the review petition the presence of the Advocate should be transferred to AXXVI, r 6, on any suitable ground, the application was not approved Constitution of Pakistan (1973) was dismissed, Article 188 [Supreme Court Review]

1983 S C M R 903

Present: Nasim Hasan Shah and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ

Mst. MAQBOOL BEGUM AND OTHERS‑Petitioners

Versus

GULLAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Review Petition No. 20‑R of 1981, heard on 4th July, 1983.

(On appeal from the judgment dated 2‑11‑1981 of the Supreme Court in C. P. S. L. A. No. 721 of 1981).

Supreme Court Rules, 1980‑

‑‑ O. XXVI, r. 6‑Review petition not drawn by Advocate who appeared and argued petition for leave to appeal before Supreme Court‑Advocate‑on‑record filing application for grant of exemption in this respect and praying that presence of Advocate at time of review petition as laid down by O. XXVI, r. 6 be dispensed with‑No sufficient ground having been made out, application not granted‑Petition dismissed‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 188.‑[Review by Supreme Court].

M. Kowkab Iqbal, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Sh. Inayat Ali, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondent No. 1 (i to xi).

Saeedur Rehman Farrukh, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents Nos. 2 and 3.

Date of hearing : 4th July, 1983.

ORDER

NASIM HASAN SHAH,

J.‑This is a petition seeking review of this Court's order dated 2‑11‑1981 passed in Civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 721 of 1981.

The review petition is not drawn up by Mr. A. R. Shaikh, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, who appeared and argued Civil Petition No. 721 of 1981 before the Court, as provided by rule 6, Order XXVI of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980.

Mr. Kowkab Iqbal, Advocate‑on‑Record, has, however, filed an application praying that exemption may be granted in this respect and the presence of Mr. A. R. Sheikh, Senior Advocate, at the time of hearing of the review petition, as laid down under rule 6, Order XXVI of the Supreme Court Rules, may be dispensed with.

We have considered these requests but do not find that any sufficient ground is made out for granting them.

This petition is, therefore, dismissed for non‑compliance with the rules.

M. Z. M. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.