Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HAFEEZ BEGUM versus ABDUS SATTAR


Article 185 (3 West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), Article 13 is a breach of the Tenant Controller's Order which prohibits the landlord from paying rent for 3 consecutive months for up to 8 years). Protection against the eviction was granted. Accordingly no dispute was being settled, the court was executed, which the tenant controller cannot commit behind the tenant committing himself. It does not deserve any relief petition
1983 S C M R 885

Present : Muhammad Haleem, Actg. C. J., S. A. Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ

Mst. HAFEEZ BEGUM AND OTHERS‑Petitioners,

versus

ABDUS SATTAR‑Respondent

Civil Petition, No. 969 of 1983, decided on 6th July, 1983.

(On appeal 81 of 1982) judgment of the High Court, dated 11‑6‑1983 passed in C. R.No. 781 of 1982.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

‑‑ Art. 185(3‑‑West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), S. 13‑Tenant committing breach of order of Rent Controller by which he was granted protection against ejectment for 8 years by not paying rent to landlord for 3 consecutive months‑Tenant contending before executing Court that landlord had told him to collect rent on his visit to his shop and, therefore, he did not pay rent‑Contention being not stipulated in order of Rent Controller, executing Court, held, cannot go behind order of Rent Controller‑Tenant himself committing breach not entitled to any relief‑Petition dismissed.

S. M. Tayyab, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners.

Ch. Muhammad Hassan, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 6th July, 1983.

ORDER

MUHAMNAD HALEEM, ACTG., C. J.‑

The petitioner failed to pay the rent for three consecutive months, and, accordingly, committed a breach of the order of the Rent Controller dated the 10th of May, 1980, by which he was granted protection against ejectment for 8 years. His case before the Executing Court was that the respondent himself had told him that he would collect the rent on his visit to the shop, and it was, thereafter, that the rent was not paid. This was not the stipulation in the order dated the 10th of May, 1980, and, therefore the Executing Court could not go behind it. The petitioner himself committed a breach of the order and he is not entitled to any relief. The petition is dismissed as without substance.

M.Z.M. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Hazro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.