Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MERAJ DIN versus DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN


Article 183 (3) of the West Pakistan Citizen Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959) was read, allowing the investigation of section 13 eviction proceedings (i) the applicant tenant due to the irregularity in the production of evidence. Defenses can be eliminated. And (ii) a decision on the merits of the matter should have been made by relying on prior action.

1983 S C M R 666

[Lahore]

Present : Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Shafiur Rehman, JJ

MERAJ DIN‑Petitioner

versus

DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 585 of 1982, decided on 6th February, 1983.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated 5th June, 1982 in W. P. 569/82).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

‑‑ Art. 183 (3) read with West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), S. 13‑Ejectment proceedings‑Leave to appeal‑Granted to examine (i) whether defence of petitioner tenant could be struck off on ground of his misconduct in produc tion of evidence and (ii) whether a decision on merits of case should have been rendered trusting it on ex parte action.

Dr. A. Basit, Advocate Supreme Court and Hamid Aslam Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 6th February, 1983.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑

Two questions arise for examination in this petition for special leave to appeal against orders of petitioner's eviction

(a) whether the defence of the petitioner tenant could be struck of on the ground of his misconduct in the production of evidence or his case could only be closed by the order of the Court ; and,

(b) whether it was not necessary, in the circumstances of the case, that a decision on the merits of the case should have been rendered treating it, at the most an ex parte action

"and in that eventuality, what would have been the result of such an exercise.

We accordingly grant leave to appeal.

Security Rs. 2,000. Appeal to be prepared on the present record with liberty to the parties to file additional documents.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Chawinda lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.