Find a Lawyer

IMAM BAKHSH versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) Definition of Evidence The statements of both witnesses were permanent The FIR was filed at midnight at 6 pm 30 minutes, the complainant was a female of illiterate cows with no telephone or compromise reported. The delay in filing an FIR cannot be considered fatal. Identification question could arise when the suspects knew about the complainant that the suspect could be identified in the light of the light bulb, eye witnesses confirmed the complainant's version of the forensic expert's corroborated account medical evidence. Unauthorized invoicing appeals were dismissed at the time of verification

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• TARAH DAD KHAN v. State 2014 YLR 2632
• SAADULLAH KHAN v. State 2014 YLR 2638
• BOARD OF GOVERNOR\'S through Secretary v. MUSHARAF KHAN 2014 YLR 2667
• ABDULLAH KHAN v. State 2014 YLR 2721
• LATIF-UR-REHMAN v. Haji FARMANULLAH 2014 PLD 1
• AHTABAR GUL v. State 2014 PLD 10
• RAHMAT ULLAH v. State 2014 PCrLJ 11
• SHAKEEL AHMED v. State 2014 YLR 12

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

us immigration advocates from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes