Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
1983 P L C 780
[Labour Appellate Tribunal
Present : Z. A. Channa, Appellate Tribunal
MUHAMMAD SAMI
versus
K. E. S. C. LTD.
Appeal No. KAR‑347 of 1982, heard on
--‑‑S. 7 (3) and Notification No. S. R. O. 955 (l) /76 dated 25th Sep tember, 1976‑Karachi Electric Supply Company‑Declared as Essential Service‑Employees covered by Ordinance‑Grievance petition against termination of service, held, rightly not entertained by Labour Court‑Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Ss. 25‑A & 38.
K.F.S.C.v.N.I.R.C.PLD1982SCI13Iel,
Sabihuddin Ahmed for Appellant.
Date of hearing :
DECISION
The appellant, who was originally employed as telephone operator- cum‑clerk in the respondent corporation, was promoted to the post of Assistant Public Relations Officer. His services were terminated by letter, dated
2. The sole ground on which Mr. Sabihuddin Ahmed, the learned counsel of the appellant, has assailed the decision of the learned Labour Court is that subsection (3) of section 7 of the Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952, require that a complaint under the said section for infringement of the provision of the Act can be fled by any Officer duly authorised by the Federal Government but no such notification has been issued with the consequence that there is no forum to which an aggrieved employee can have redress. By the following notification, published in the Gazette of Pakistan, dated 25th September, 1976, the a Deputy Commissioners througout Pakistan have been authorised, within their respective jurisdiction, to make complaints in Courts in respect of offences under the Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952 :‑
S. R. O. 955 (1)/76 . . . . . . . In exercise of the powers conferred by subsection (i) of section 4, and subsection (3) of section 7 of the Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952 (LIII of 1952), tile Federal Government is pleased to authorise the Deputy Commissioners, within their respective jurisdiction, to exercise the following powers, namely :‑
(a) to direct, by general or special order, any person or persons employed in or in connection with‑ ,
(i) the organisations dealing with generation, transmission, dis tribution of supply of electricity ; or
(ii) the oil refineries and the organizations dealing with the pro duction, purification, transmission, distribution or market ing of oil or natural gas not to depart out of such area or areas as may be speci fied in such order , and
(b) to make complaints in the Courts in respect of offences under the
said Act."
3. I would, accordingly, dismiss this appeal in limine,
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer