Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

versus


On September 25, 1976, the Karachi Electric Supply Company declared as compulsory service employees that section 7 (3) and notification no. An anti-ordinance complaint application was heard, not properly entertained by the Labor Court Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), sections 25A & 38.

1983 P L C 780

[Labour Appellate Tribunal

Sind

]

Present : Z. A. Channa, Appellate Tribunal

MUHAMMAD SAMI

versus

K. E. S. C. LTD.

Appeal No. KAR‑347 of 1982, heard on 18th August, 1982.

Pakistan

Essential Services (Maintenance) Act (LIII of 1952)‑--

--‑‑S. 7 (3) and Notification No. S. R. O. 955 (l) /76 dated 25th Sep tember, 1976‑Karachi Electric Supply Company‑Declared as Essential Service‑Employees covered by Ordinance‑Grievance petition against termination of service, held, rightly not entertained by Labour Court‑Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Ss. 25‑A & 38.

K.F.S.C.v.N.I.R.C.PLD1982SCI13Iel,

Sabihuddin Ahmed for Appellant.

Date of hearing :18th August, '1982.

DECISION

The appellant, who was originally employed as telephone operator- cum‑clerk in the respondent corporation, was promoted to the post of Assistant Public Relations Officer. His services were terminated by letter, dated 13th February, 1982, which is said to have beer, received by the appellant on 16th February, 1982. Tue appellant challenged the said order through a grievance petition filed before the learned Fifth Labour Court but the same was rejected, relying on the decision of their Lordships of the Supreme Court in the case of K. E. S. C. v. N. I. R. C. (PLD 1982 S C113,), on the ‑ground that the provisions of the Pakistan Essential Services (Mainte nance) Act, 1952, are applicable to the employees of the respondent corporation anal these employees cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the Labour Court in respect of termination of their services. Dissatisfied with the decision of the learned Labour Court the appellant has come up in appeal to this Tribunal.

2. The sole ground on which Mr. Sabihuddin Ahmed, the learned counsel of the appellant, has assailed the decision of the learned Labour Court is that subsection (3) of section 7 of the Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952, require that a complaint under the said section for infringement of the provision of the Act can be fled by any Officer duly authorised by the Federal Government but no such notification has been issued with the consequence that there is no forum to which an aggrieved employee can have redress. By the following notification, published in the Gazette of Pakistan, dated 25th September, 1976, the a Deputy Commissioners througout Pakistan have been authorised, within their respective jurisdiction, to make complaints in Courts in respect of offences under the Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952 :‑

S. R. O. 955 (1)/76 . . . . . . . In exercise of the powers conferred by subsection (i) of section 4, and subsection (3) of section 7 of the Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952 (LIII of 1952), tile Federal Government is pleased to authorise the Deputy Commissioners, within their respective jurisdiction, to exercise the following powers, namely :‑

(a) to direct, by general or special order, any person or persons employed in or in connection with‑ ,

(i) the organisations dealing with generation, transmission, dis tribution of supply of electricity ; or

(ii) the oil refineries and the organizations dealing with the pro duction, purification, transmission, distribution or market ing of oil or natural gas not to depart out of such area or areas as may be speci fied in such order , and

(b) to make complaints in the Courts in respect of offences under the

said Act."

3. I would, accordingly, dismiss this appeal in limine,

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from FR Kohat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.