Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

RAHIM BAKBSH versus PIR BAKHSH


Section 24 allows the transfer of charges against the Presiding Officer for making observations that raise concerns about neutrality in the party's mind.

1983 C L C 3313

[Lahore]

Before M. Mehboob Ahmad, J

RAHIM BAKHSH AND OTHERS ‑Petitioners

versus

PIR BAKHSH Respondent

Transfer Application No. 261‑C of 1981, decided on 19th March, 1983.

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑

‑‑‑ S. 24‑Transfer of case‑Allegations made against Presiding Officer for making observations causing apprehension in mind of party about his impartiality‑Transfer of case allowed.

Shahid Hussain Kadri for Petitioners.

Respondent in person.

Date of bearing: 19th March, 1983.

JUDGMENT

This is a petition under section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure for transfer of an appeal titled "Pir Bakhsh v. Rahim Bakhsh" from the Court of Sh. Saeed Ahmad, Additional District Judge, Sheikhupura, to some other Court of competent jurisdiction.

2. This application for transfer of the appeal aforementioned was filed on the ground that the learned Additional District Judge seized of the matter has made observations which have caused a genuine apprehension in the mind of the petitioners that the Court seized of the matter is not impartial towards them.

3. The respondent, who has appeared in person, submits that the petitioners are using dilatory tactics only and have levelled false allegations against the Presiding Officer. He, however, states that he has no objection to the transfer of the case to any other competent Court, but would request that the Court to which the case may be transferred should be directed to dispose of the case expeditiously.

4. The respondent has also filed a reply to the transfer application wherein he has raised the same contentions as have been raised today before me.

5. In view of the foregoing, accepting this petition, I direct that the appeal titled‑"Pir Bakhsh v. Rahim Bakhsh" be withdrawn from the Court of Sh. Saeed Ahmad, Additional District Judge, Sheikhupura, and entrusted B to the learned District Judge, Sheikhupura,: for adjudication in accordance with law. There will, however, be no order as to costs.

6. The parties have been directed to appear before the learned District Judge, Sheikhupura, on 2nd April, 1983, who shall decide the appeal finally by 19th May, 1983 and report compliance of this direction to the Registrar of this Court.

M. Y. H. Application allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Dhatmal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.