Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ANWARUDDIN versus SETTLEMENT DEPARTMENT


Section 2, Clauses (i) and (v) repeal of the Claims Registration (Displaced Persons) Act (111 of 1956) and the Disposal of Land Claims (XLVII of the Land Settlement) Act (1958) of a claim relating to obsolete land. Confirmation of Affirmation Since the Rural and Allotment certifies one's heritage as a citizen, upon belonging to the Central Record Room, the Deputy Claims Commissioner has also confirmed the heritage - canceling the allotment in lieu of the City Assistant Commissioner. While directing and filing a case, the claims were confirmed by the Deputy Claims Commissioner, `` Allotment was further held in the dispute under the relevant relevant law and within the privilege. Pending confirmation of the Rural Land Board of Revenue may notify canceled after notice to people who may have dedicated officer instead. Concerned
1983 C L C 2463

(Lahore)

Before Abdul Shakurul Salam and Muhammad Aslam Mian, J

ANWARUDDIN AND OTHERS-Petitioners

versus

SETTLEMENT DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS-Respondents

Writ Petition No. 594/11 of 1981, decided on 18th December, 1982.

Evacuee Property and Displaced .Persons Laws (Repeal) Act (XIV of 1975)-

S. 2, clauses (i) & (v)-Repeal of Registration of Claims (Displa ced Persons) Act (111 of 1956) and Displaced' Persons (Land Settle ment) Act (XLVII of 1958)-Effect of-A's claim for abandoned land verified as rural and allotment made-A's heirs getting same claim verified as urban-On reference from Central Record Room, Deputy Claims Commissioner also verifying heirs' claim as urban Assistant Commissioner canceling allotment made in lieu thereof and directing registration of case-Held, verification of claims by Deputy Claims Commissioner final' under relevant law and .allot ment in dispute within entitlement-Held further, Member Board of Revenue may entrust matter of earlier verification of abandoned land as rural and allotment in lieu thereof to notified officer who may cancel same after notice to persons concerned.

Malik Ghulam Ahmad v. Haji Muhammad Yousaf and others P L D 1976 S C 271 ref.

Sh. Abdul Aziz for Petitioner.

Sh. Riaz Ahmad A. G. with Altaf Muhammad Khan, Sardar Nazar Muhammad Dogar, Ch. Muhammad Nazir Ahmad and Kh. Altaf Ahmad for Respondents.

Dates of hearing: 22nd, 30th November, 1981; 10th April., 6th, 22nd, 27th, 29th, 30th November; 4th to 14th, 7th, 11th to 18th December, 1982.

JUDGMENT

ABDUL SHAKURUL SALAM, J.-This order will dispose of Writ Petitions (1) No. 594/11-81, (2) 595/11-81, (3) 596/11-81, (4) 597/11-81, (5) 598/11-81 and (6) 599111-81 as well as Writ Petitions (7) No. 659/ R-81, (8) 660/R-81, (9) 661/11-81 and (10) 662/11-81. The first set of petitions are by allottees and the second by vendees of some of the allotted land.

2. Relevant facts as gathered from the petitions and parawise com ments by the A. C. respondent No. 1, are that one Anwaruddin filed a claim for abandoned land, which was verified as rural and allotment made. His heirs, a son and five daughters-the petitioners filed claims which were verified as urban. On reference from the Central Record Room, Claims Commissioner entrusted the matter to late Mr. Jaziluddin Farooqi, Deputy Claims Commissioner-an officer of unimpeachable integrity who verified the petitioners' claims as urban. Allotments in lieu thereof were made in villages Amarsidhu, Baghanwala and Charar. Allotment in the first village went out of the hands of the petitioners because local Muslims being occupancy tenants got decrees in their favour. Allotments in the last village Charar has been cancelled by the A. C. (Sadar) and he has directed registration of case vide order dated 12th October, 1981. This is challen ged by the allottees and the vendees.

3. The case of the petitioners is that the orders of verification of their claims and allotments had become final under the relevant laws; the laws themselves have been repealed since 1st July, 1974 vide Act XIV of 1975; the respondent A. C. had no jurisdiction to pass the order. The action is illegal and arbitrary having been passed in the secrecy of office without notice to petitioners who have been prejudicially affected.

4. The case of the Settlement Department is that the verification of claim as urban was invalid and that the allotment cancelled is in excess of entitlement.

5. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record carefully. Verification of claims by the Deputy Claims Commissioner was final' under the relevant law and the allotment in dispute in village Charar is within the entitlement. The basis of the impug ned order is knocked out. However, in view of Malik Ghulam Ahmad v Haji Muhammad Yousaf and others (P L D 1976 S C 271) we pass no order as regards registration or investigation of-the case. As regards tire assertion of the department that the abandoned land had earlier been verified as rural and allotment made in lieu, thereof, the learned Member Board of Revenue may entrust the matter to a notified officer who may cancel the same if the fact be as asserted, after notice to the persons concerned in accordance with law. These petitions are thus disposed of.

K. M. A. Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Ambela lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.