Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 bail accused of forging illicit relations between the parties.

1983 P Cr. L J 2394 (1)

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 898‑B of 1982, decided on 28th April, 1982.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑‑S. 497‑Bail‑Developing of illicit relations between parties alleg ed‑Police having no material regarding commission of Zina-- Petitioners allowed bail in circumstances of case.

Mehar Ghulam Ali Mobashar for Petitioners.

Ch. Muhammad Mansha for the State.

ORDER

Muhammad Siddiq and Mst. Irshad Begum petitioners have moved this petition for bail in a case registered against them under sections 10 and DI of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, and sections 380 and 411 of the Pakistan Penal Code. The case was registered on the report of Muhammad Nawaz, brother of Mst. Irshad Begum. 1n the F.I.R. he alleged that Muhammad Siddiq developed illicit relations with Mst. Irshad Begum, on the night between 20th, 21st September, 1981 be alongwith two others armed with guns and a hatchet trespassed in his house and took away Mst. Irshad Begum. The latter took away Rs. 2,000 in cash and some ornaments from the house.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners contends that except the alleged statements of the petitioners before the police that they developed illicit relations with each other, there is no material with the prosecution to show .that they had been committing Zina. The learned State counsel does not controvert this contention and states that the prosecution is not in possession of any direct evidence regarding the allegation of Zina. In the circumstances, the petitioners are admitted to bail in the sum of Rs . 20, each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Bhalwal.

M.Y.M. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Gakhar Mandi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.