Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GAMAN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 completely denies the allegations of kidnapping and abduction.

1983 P Cr. L J 2221 (2)

[Lahore]

Before Fazal‑e‑Mahmood, J

GAMAN‑Appellant

Versus

THE STATE-----Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.. 442‑R of 1983, decided on 13th March, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑‑-----S. 497‑Alleged abductee and victim of rape completely denying allegation of her abduction ‑ No other tangible evidence regarding commission of offence of Zina or abduction‑Bail allowed, in circumstances.

Sardar Shaukat Ali for Petitioner.

M. Sharif for the State.

ORDER

The petitioner was reported against vide F. I. R. No. 184/82 Police Station Kanganpur on 24th September, 1982 under section 16 of----Ordi nance V11 of 1979. During the investigation however, sections 10 and 11 of the Ordinance were also added and the alleged abductee Mst. Zohra Bibi was also made a co‑accused.

2. There was previously a writ petition filed by Mst. Zohra Bibi being W. P. No. 4034/82 challening this very F. I. R. The statement of the girl was recorded by the Investigating Officer in which she completely denied the allegation of abduction and did not support the F. I. R. version.

3. There is no tangible evidence with the prosecution according to the Investigating Officer regarding the commission of the offence of Zina or abduction. As the position stands today, therefore, I am of the view, that there are no reasonable grounds for believing that the petitioner is guilty of the offences with which he is charged. He is accordingly admit ted to bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Kasur.

4. The A. S. I. states that his absence on the last date was not wilful because he did not receive the communication from the High Court and when the record had been produced he was already out of station on investigation. His absence, therefore, not being deliberate, no action against him is called for.

S.G.D. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Hasilpur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.