Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAZIRAN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497 and 498 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Bail of the accused under the bail of Section 497 (I) according to the brother's first information report. Has been listed. Atta

1983 P Cr. L J 1972

[Lahore]

Before Javid Iqbal, J

Asst: NAZIRAN-Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1884/B of 1975, decided on 30th .May, 1975.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

------Ss. 497 & 498--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/34-Bail Mutder---Main culprit according to First Information Report brother of accused (woman)-Case of accused covered by proviso to S. 497 (I)-Bail granted.

Akhtar Hasan for Petitioner.

Walayat Umar Chaudhry for the State.

ORDER

A case is registered against Mst. Naziran alias Rani petitioner alongwith her brother Bashir and one Muhammad Aslam alias Achhu under section 302/34, P. P. C. at Police Station, Naurang, District Sheikhupura on the 22nd of February, 1974. The allegation against her is that she gave a hatchet to her brother Bashir and with that hatchet Bashir attacked Hanif deceased her husband, and murdered him. In other words, according to the F. I. R. the main culprit in his case is Bashir. It is contended by learned counsel on her behalf that firstly Mst. Naziran petitioner was a woman and was entitled to bail for her case was covered by the proviso to section 497 (1), Cr: P. C. It is next contended that no other overt act has been attributed to her brother who is stated to have used the same for the murder of deceased. It is submitted that she herself did not cause any injury to the deceased and her handing over the hatchet may be an exaggeration on the part of the interested witnesses who were hostile towards her because she did not have good relations with her husband, the deceased. Lastly it is contended that the case was registered against the petitioners on the 22nd of February, 1974, and now it is since more than one year that the commitment proceedings have not yet been completed.

2. I have heard learned counsel for both the sides. The case of the petitioner is covered by the proviso to section 497 (1), Cr. P. C.,'1.IB therefore, admit her to bail subject to her furnishing security in the sum of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees ten thousand only). with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Resident Magistrate, Ferozewala. This petition stands disposed of.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Gambet lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.