Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
1983 C L C 576 (1)
[Lahore]
Before Aftab Hussain, J
MUHAMMAD ANWAR‑Petitioner
versus
PUNJAB PROVINCE AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Civil Revision No. 260 of 1980, decided on Ist March, 1980. Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) ‑‑ S. 115 and O. XXXIX, rr. I & 2‑Revision petition against conditional stay order‑Petitioner liable to pay Government sub stantial amount‑Civil suit without depositing amount not competent‑Conditional stay order issued‑Petitioner, held, cannot feel aggrieved against such order.‑[Injunction].
Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azeem for Petitioner.
The learned Civil judge‑has found after spot inspection that prim facie the petitioner is liable to pay to the Government at least some substantial amount. In view of this the Civil suit was not competent without deposit of the amount he is called upon to pay to the respondent. Notwithstanding this if a conditional stay order has been issued it would prove that the court has shown a concession to the petitioner. HC cannot feel aggrieved against it.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer