Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD JAMIL versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE


Section 10 Colony land is actually reserved for Christians \ Allotment of such land to cemetery applicants, held, was rightfully canceled by the Board of Revenue.

1983 C L C 406 (1)

[Lahore]

Before K. M. A. Samadani, J

MUHAMMAD JAM IL‑Petitioner

versus

MEMBER, BOARD Or REVENUE AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Writ Petition No. 495 of 1977, decided on 21st March, 1977.

Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)‑

‑‑ S. 10‑Colony land‑Land originally reserved for Christians' graveyard‑Allotment of such land to petitioners, held, rightly cancelled by Board of Revenue.

Ch. M. Ashraf Azeem for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 21st March, 1977.

ORDER

The dispute is with regard to Killa No. 25 in Square No. 39. The petitioner claims to be the allottee of this killa, the allotment in his favour having been extended for five years w. e. f. 3rd April, 1975. But the allotment was later cancelled as it transpired that the killa in dispute stood reserved as a graveyard for Christians. The Collector, however, decided to keep the petitioner's allotment in respect of the said killa intact and instead set aside some other piece of land for the graveyard. But the Additional Commissioner reversed the order of Collector and cancelled the petitioner's allotment so that Killa No. 25 might be used by the Christians as a graveyard. Thereupon the petitioner approached the Board of Revenue. The learned Member Colonies finding no irregularity or illegality in the order of the Additional Commissioner, maintained it, Hence this writ petition.

2. In view of the fact that the land in dispute was originally reserved for the graveyard, the order of the learned Member, Board of Revenue, is unexceptionable. There is no defect of jurisdiction in the impugned orders. Therefore, no interference with the said orders in the exercise of the Constitutional jurisdiction of this Court is warranted.

3. The petition is accordingly dismissed in limine.

M. Y. H. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Abbaspur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.