Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FAQIR HUSSAIN & CO. versus ASGHAR ALI GHULAM HUSSAIN ANTRIA


The second appeal for the removal of Section 15 was made by the appellant, which was dismissed by the Karachi Development Authority on the demolition of the building.
1983 C L C 2270

[Karachi]

Before K. A. Ghani, ,l

FAQIR HUSSAIN & Co.‑Appellant

versus

ASGHAR ALI GHULAM HUSSAIN ANTRIA

AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 3308 of 1981, in Second Appeal No. 265 of 1974, decided on 16th December, 1981.

West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑

‑‑ S. 15‑Ejectment‑Second Appeal‑Appellant standing ejected on demolition of building by Karachi Development Authority‑ Appeal becoming infructuous dismissed as withdrawn.

Aftab Kizalbash for Appellant.

Moniruddin for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 16th December, 1981.

JUDGMENT

This is an application filed by the learned Advocate for the res pondent praying therein that the appeal be dismissed as having become infructuous on the ground that the demised building/premises does not exist as the same has already been demolished by the Karachi Deve lopment Authority and that all the tenants (including appellants) stand ejected therefrom.

2. Without going into the merits of the case and without preju dice to the rights of the appellants the learned counsel for the appel lants concedes that the appeal has become infructuous. He however, submits that the appellants would seek other legal remedies, which may be available to them in the circumstances of the case.

The learned counsel for 'appellants accordingly does not oppose the application to the extent that the appeal has become infructuous.

3. The application (C. M. A. 3308/81) is granted and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

C. M, A. No. 3408/81‑In the circumstances mentioned in the above order passed on C. M. A. No. 3308/81, the learned counsel for the appellants, withdraws this application. Application is dismissed.

M.Y.H. Orders accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Sargodha lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.