Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 304A & 304/279/377 in which three persons were injured and one child died while section 304 instead of section 304. Under 304, the mini bus has been included in the crime. It is not known whether to bring the case under section 304A to section 304 so that further investigation is needed.

1983 P Cr. LJ 2039 (1)

[Karachi]

Before Muhammad Zahoorul Haq, J

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE‑Applicant

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Bail Application No. 729 of 1979, decided on 7th August, 1979.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

--------S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 304‑A & 304/279/377 Accused causing injuries to three persons and death of one child while driving Mini Bus‑Addition of offence under S. 304 instead of S. 304‑A not known‑Bringing of case from S. 304‑A to S. 304 requiring further enquiry‑‑As to why S. 304 applied not explained‑ Accused granted bail in circumstances of case.

Muhammad Yaseen Azad for Applicant.

Mazharul Haq, Asstt, A.‑G. for the State.

ORDER

In this case, the accused, while driving his Mini Bus had caused injury, to three persons and death of one child while coming from Khyyam Cinema to Tariq Road. Bail has been refused to him, as Police had submitted challan under section 304/279/377, P.P.C. One does not know as to why section 304 has been added instead of section 304‑A which is the section for offences in respect of rash and negligent driving. It would require further enquiry to bring the case from section 304‑A to 304, P.P.C. Mr Mazharid Haq opposes the bail application as according to him, the applicant was very rash. However, I would grant bail to the accused in the sum of Rs. 20,000 with P.R. in the like amount to the satisfaction of VIII Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi, as there is no explanation as far as to why section 304, P.P.C. has been applied.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Bunner lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.