Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SMITH KLINE AND FRENCH OF PAKISTAN LIMITED versus LABOUR COURT NO. IV, KARACHI


The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 was granted on the joint plea of the parties to the central application and the respondents were requested to solicit the defendant's order with regard to ad hoc relief, not requested in the petition. Was gone, there was no Lux Standby to challenge the same request. Dismiss

1983 P L C 72 (1)

[

Karachi

High Court]

Before B. G. N. Kazi, J

SMITH KLINE AND FRENCH OF PAKISTAN LIMITED

versus

LABOUR COURT No.

IV,

KARACHI

AND ANOTHER

C.M.A. Nos. S‑154 and 155 of 1980 in Constitutional Petition No. 974 of 1974, decided on 20th December, 1981.

Constitution of

Pakistan

(1973)‑

‑‑‑ Art. 199‑Main petition allowed at joint request of parties and their counsel for setting aside order of respondent with regard to ad hoc relief to respondent‑‑Applicant challenging such order not party in petition, held, had no locus standi to challenge same‑ Petition dismissed.

Latifur Rahman Sarwari for Petitioner.

ORDER

The two applications are by applicant who was not a respondent in the main petition and therefore has no locus standi.

The main petition allowed at the joint request of the parties and their Counsel that impugned order dated 17th April, 1974 of the Sind Labour Court No. 4, with regard to ad hoc relief in favour of respondent No. 2 be set aside with no order as to costs. The aforesaid was passed in presence of the Counsel including Mr. Zia Qureshi who appeared for res pondent and had authority and power given to him by the respondent Union to enter into a compromise or withdraw the proceedings on their behalf. The two applications are therefore dismissed on the short ground that the applicant had no locus standi.

Applications dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Kohistan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.