Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

F. A. KHAN versus REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN


O XXI, r 28 The civil court petitioner declares that the illegal applicant's removal order and the payment of arrears is not a decree, and in this case the courts should refuse the applicant's application in this case. There can be no mistake hanging.

1982 S C M R 518

Present : Abdul Kadir Shaikh and Shafi‑ur‑Rehman, JJ

F. A. KHAN‑Petitioner

Versus

THE REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN Etc.--Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 128 of 1979, decided on 10th March, 1981.

(On appeal the judgment of High Court, Lahore dated 3‑12‑1978 in R. S. A. No. 737 of 1977).

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑

‑‑ O. XXI, r. 28‑Decree of civil Court declaring dismissal of petitioner illegal‑Petitioner's re‑instatement and payment ‑of arrears not part of decree‑No fault, held, can be found with executing Courts in refusing petitioner's request in such regard.

Petitioner in person.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 10th March, 1981.

ORDER

ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.

‑The petitioner sought to execute the decree passed in his favour by which the order of dismissal from service dated 15‑8‑1950 was declared as illegal and ultra vires. The executing Court rejected the executing application on the ground that the declaratory decree could not be executed. Petitioner's prayer for execution of the decree for the purpose of recovery of arrears of his salary and allowances was also refused. Petitioner's appeal was dismissed by the Additional District Judge, Lahore and his second appeal was also dismissed by the Lahore High Court and he now seeks special leave to appeal.

The petitioner who argued in person submits that the respondents have neither re‑instated him in service nor have they paid any salary and allowance due to him and he is at least entitled to the payment of the arrears of salary and allowances.

Petitioner's grievance, as a layman, does not seem to be without substance, but what he prays for is not the part of the decree passed in his favour and no fault can be found with the Courts in refusing his request.

We, however, cannot help observing that it was for the Government in the concerned Department to take notice of the decision of the Court of law particularly when the appeal filed by the Government against the judgment and decree passed in petitioner's suit was dismissed by the District Judge, Lahore and the second appeal to the Lahore High Court also met with same fate.

This petition, however, has no force and is dismissed in limine.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
inheritance advocates near New Saeedabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.