Find a Lawyer

PAYO KHAN ALIAS KAKAY versus STATE

Sections 3 and 4 of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance (X-X of 1965), Section 13 (e) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 103 pass hand grenades and unlicensed weapons contain statements of evidence retrieval proceedings Was held without a license rifle 303 bore, a TT pistol 22 bore, a bundler containing 15 live cartridges and a hand grenade, serious suspicion in connection with the manufacture of self-healing. At present, the statements of the recovery witnesses had to be filed soon in case of recovery. Later on the spot but the recovery witness admitted that his statement was recorded in the police station and he was not present at the recovery. Was not an independent person. Prosecutors involved in the recovery proceedings not only failed to prove the alleged recovery of the X accused of possession of material and weapons and ammunition but also failed to prove the case without doubt. Set aside the convictions and convictions passed by and allowed the appellant in the circumstances to be acquitted of the charges

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014

• HABIBULLAH v. State 2014 YLR 1833
• FAZAL BARI v. MODEL CUSTOM COLLECTOR, CUSTOM HOUSE, QUETTA 2014 PTD 1847
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PTD 1881
• USMAN LTD. v. LASBELLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HUB INDUSTRIAL TRADING ESTTAE HUB LASBELLA 2014 YLR 1893
• TALAT WAHEED KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN 2014 YLR 2415
• MUHAMMAD QAHIR SHAH v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, through Secretary, Islamabad 2014 YLR 2571
• MUHAMMAD ALAM v. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN 2014 PLD 1
• SAADULLAH v. SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT 2014 MLD 19

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2014 →

female advocates from Mehar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes