Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ROSHAN versus ALI AHMAD


O XXIII, r 3 Settlement of the parties and the settlement before the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal, leaving the parties to incur their expense in the terms of the Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3)

1982 S C M R 400 (1)

Present : Aslam Riaz Hussain and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ

ROSHAN AND OTHERS‑Petitioners

Versus

ALI AHMAD‑Respondent

Civil Appeal No. 111 of 1981 in Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 130 of 1980, decided on 29th April, 1981.

(On petition against the order of the High Court of Lahore dated 15‑1‑1980 in R. S. A. No. 14 of 1980)

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑

‑‑ O.XXIII, r. 3‑Compromise of suit Parties entering into compro mise and admitting same before Court‑Petition for leave to appeal converted into appeal and allowed in terms of compromise, leaving parties to bear their own costs‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185 (3).

Ghulam Sarwar Chaudri, Advocate Supreme Court and Mahmood A. Qureshi Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Respondent in person.

Date of hearing : 29th April, 1981.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑‑

Roshan etc., petitioners, purchased some land in village Koth Gujjran, Tehsil and District Gujranwala. Ali Ahmed, respondent, filed a suit to pre‑empt the said sale claiming to have a superior right of pre‑emption as against the petitioners. The suit was decreed, whereupon the petitioners filed an appeal, which was dismissed by the Additional District Judge on 6‑12‑1979. The petitioners then filed an R. S. A. in the High Court which met the same fate vide the impugned judgment dated 15‑1‑1980.

The petitioners thereupon filed the present C. P. S. L. A.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have entered into a compromise and prays that the appeal be allowed in terms of the compromise. Ali Ahmed, respondent, is also present in Court, and admits the compromise. The terms of the compromise are that Ali Ahmed, respondent, shall forego his right of pre‑emption in favour of the petitioners who shall retain the land in dispute in return the petitioners shall pay Ali Ahmed, respondent, a sum of Rs. 87000 Ali Ahmed shall also be at liberty to withdraw Rs. 30,000 deposited by him towards the Zare Panjum and the pre‑emption money.

3. In view of the above‑noted compromise which is admitted by both/ the parties, the petition is converted into an appeal and is allowed in terms of the compromise leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Gari Mori lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.