Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SHABBIR-UR-RAHMAN versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, G. H. Q.RAWALPINDI CANTT.


Article 3 and 4 read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Seniority patient applicants were not affected by the ineligible sanitary assignment and in fact the affected persons did not apply as a party nor Challenged the petitioner, which the tribunal correctly found. A bereaved person and his appeal were rightly rejected

1982 S C M R 1135

Present: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ

MUHAMMAD SHABBIR‑UR‑RAHMAN‑Petitioner

Versus

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER; G. H. Q. RAWALPINDI CANTT. AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 24‑R of 1982, decided on 26th May, 1982.

(On appeal from the judgment and order dated 25‑10‑1981 of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad, in Appeal No. 107 (R) of 1981).

Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)‑ ‑

-----Ss. 3 & 4 read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185 (3) Seniority‑Aggrieved person‑Petitioner not affected by impugned seniority assignment and persons really affected neither impleaded as parties nor challenging same‑Petitioner, held, rightly found by Tribunal to be not an aggrieved person and his appeal rightly dismissed.

Petitioner in person.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 26th May, 1982.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J‑

‑Leave to appeal has been sought from judgment dated 25‑10‑1981 of the Federal Service Tribunal ; whereby petitioner's appeal regarding seniority assigned to Abdul Qayyum respondent, was dismissed.

One reason for the dismissal of petitioner's appeal was that he being junior to Abdul Qayyum respondent before and after the impugned seniority assignment, was not an aggrieved person so as to invoke the appellate jurisdic tion of the Central Tribunal under section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973.

We questioned the petitioner whether he would be affected by the impugned seniority assignment and whether those who in fact are affected, challenged the same or have been impleaded as parties but he answered in the negative. That being so, we agree with the Tribunal that the petitioner ill the circumstances of this case, 'is not an aggrieved person, therefore, his appeal was rightly dismissed. This petition fails and accordingly is dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Haroonabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.