Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ALLAH DIN versus DILAWAR KHAN


O. XVII, r 3 Adjustment Petition Counsel has received a one-week postponement on the last date of the hearing on the oral request, however, on the post-hearing date, they do not bother to make a formal application for postponement and It is considered sufficient to send it. A certificate relating to the death of his uncle on that day, such certificate, cannot be asked for a postponement request, the request is dismissed for non-prosecution.

1982 S C M R 1070

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and M. S. H. Qureshi, JJ

ALLAH DIN-Petitioner

Versus

DILAWAR KHAN AND OTHERS-Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 308 of 1982, decided on 9th June, 1982.

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-

-----O. XVII, r. 3-Adjournment-Petitioner's counsel found to have obtained a week's adjournment on last date of hearing on an oral request-Counsel however, not even bothering on subsequent date of hearing to make a formal application for adjournment and considering it sufficient to send a certificate regarding death of his uncle on such day-Such certificate, held, could not be treated as an application for adjournment-Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.

Ch. Habibullah Khan, Advocate Supreme Court with M. A. Qadri, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.

Respondents in person.

Date of hearing : 9th June, 1982.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.-

It is 10-15 a.m. The case has been called out. Neither the petitioner, nor his counsel nor the A. O. R. nor any one on behalf of the counsel or the A. O. R. has appeared to press the petition while Dilawar and Muhammad Bashir respondents are present in person. The Court Associate, has however, handed to us a "certificate" which he informed us, has been given to the Court's Librarian by the Munshi of the petitioner's counsel. It reads as follows: -

"Certified that uncle of the undersigned counsel is dead today at Rawalpindi, hence undersigned is unable to attend the Court today 9-6-1982, request for fortnight adjournment."

(Sd.)

Capt. Ch. Habibullah Khan

The above-named respondent pointed out that even on the last date of hearing the petitioner's counsel had obtained as adjournment and that this bad been his conduct throughout in the proceedings before the High Court.

2. We notice that the petitioner' counsel had, indeed, obtained a week's adjournment on the last date of hearing (i. e. on 31-5-1982) on an oral request made by him. But this time he has not even bothered to make a forma application for an adjournment and has considered it sufficient to send a certificate' through his munshi. We are afraid we cannot treat his certificate as an application for adjournment and are constrained to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution, Ordered accordingly.

Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Ghuzdar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.