Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Criminal Review Petition No. 10‑R of 1981, decided on 23rd February, 1982.
‑‑‑ O. XXVI, r. 1‑Review‑Criminal appeal against conviction dis missed for appellant's being fugitive from law‑Petitioner remaining a fugitive from law‑Held, not entitled to seek any relief even by review.‑[Review by Supreme Court].
Hayat v. State P L D 1981. S .C 265 rel.
Raja Muhammad Anwar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Nemo for the State.
Date of hearing : 23rd February, 1982.
Heard. The appeal of the petitioner was dis missed by our judgment dated 8‑7‑1981 because he having become a fugitive from law not found entitled to any relief as held in our judgment in Hayat v, State (P L D 1981 S C 265). Review is sought on the ground that the petitioner is entitled t the same benefit as extended to his co‑convicts in the impugned judgment.
2. As held in the case of Hayat Bakhsh the petitioner having remained a fugitive from law is not entitled to seek any relief even by review.
This petition is, accordingly, dismissed. He may, if so advised, seek relief from the executive authorities.
Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer