Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

LT: COL. SARDAR FAROOQ SHAUKAT KHAN LODHI versus TALEH MUHAMMAD


Sections 24 and 27 allow an appeal whether the appeal is allowed to investigate the matter, whether the tenancy on the breach of the condition should be resumed and will be subject to restitution.

1982 S C M R 886

Present : Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and M. S. H. Qureshi. JJ

LT.‑COL. Sardar FAROOQ SHAUKAT KHAN LODHI‑Petitioner

versus

TALEH MUHAMMAD ETC.‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1171 of 1981, decided on 31st January, 1982.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, dated 29‑11‑1981 in W. P. 606 of 1981).

Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)‑

----Ss. 24 & 27‑Leave to appeal granted to examine among other grounds whether resumption of tenancy on breach of a condition subject to affording opportunity for rectification and to examine effect of S. 27 on provisions regarding rectification contained in S. 24. [Leave to appeal].

Ch. Khalilur Rehman, Advocate and Sh. Salahuddin, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 31st January, 1982.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑

In this petition arising out of a case relating to the terms and conditions of a tenancy under the Colonization o Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912 leave to appeal is granted, inter alia to examine‑

(a) whether the resumption of tenancy on breach of a condition thereof is subject to affording an opportunity for rectification and what is the effect of section 27 of the Act on the provision regarding rectification contained in section 24 of the Act as also in clause (xxvi) of the relevant Scheme

(b) whether clauses (xxvi) and (xxix) are independent or supplementary to each other, with particular reference to the opportunity regarding rectification

(c) whether the first respondent was at all entitled to any relief in writ jurisdiction of the High Court when

(i) the initial period of tenancy of ten years having passed, there was no renewal.

(ii) when the respondent No. 1 having filed a civil suit with regard to the same grievance, filed the writ petition after withdrawal of the suit but without permission to refile it.

Order accordingly. Security Rs. 2,500. The appeal shall be prepared on the present record with liberty to the parties to file additional documents if necessary.

Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Bhalwal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.